Recently, while out on the election trail, Senator John McCain was asked whether he thought it was okay that some health insurance providers covered Viagra but not birth control pills. Though the Senator ducked the issue on the spot, it brings up an important topic of debate in national healthcare, which seems to promote the ability to have sex, but not necessarily the means to do it safely.
Health Care Supported Sex: A Hot Political Topic
Fri, 07/11/2008 - 22:43 — pocket-rockerRelated Items
Visitors start here!
About us - Testimonials - Press - Advertisers - Webmasters - Contact us - Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2010 Northstar Productions, LLC.
Copyright © 2010 Northstar Productions, LLC.
For Adults Only. All models were 18 and over at the time of the creation of such depictions.






Comments
Seems a bit sexist to me.
Yeah, maybe they should provide both.
Well, one is to correct a health induced problem, and the other is the result of a choice (to have unprotected casual sex).
I'm not making a value judgement here, but it seems that casual sex is something people should pay for on their own, but if your legs weren't working, for example, it would be fair to have healthcare pay for a pill that made your legs work again.